Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul@xxxxxxxxxx): >> sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> Pavel, >>> unshare() of pid ns seems to fail with -EINVAL in 2.6.23-rc3-mm1. >>> I thought we supported it in the earlier patchsets. I guess >>> I missed that in the review of recent patchsets. >> I disabled unsharing of pid namespaces because it's almost >> impossible. Look - you have to reattach all the pids to the >> task with saving its ids as seen in previous namespaces. > > We agree, but thought you for some perverse reason preferred unshare to > clone for pidns :) I did that in my first version of patches, but then realized that such problem (the need in reattaching pids) makes the unsharing ugly. BTW, unsharing of a pid namespace is a valid operation, so I think I will enable it in the nearest future. I have some thought on how to make such a reattach ;) > Thanks for clarifying. > > -serge > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
