Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 01:57:07 -0600, > ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > >>> Got it: It's patch 6, the readdir simplification. >>> >>> (The udev on that guest is ancient (063)...) >> Ok. That is weird. > > More weirdness. If I activate another dasd from the repair file > system, /dev/dasdb is created... > > Same if I set the card reader online: /dev/vmrdr-0.0.000c is created as > expected. > >> Does it depend on the order in which the dentries are returned from >> readdir? > > I'd think not. > >> Unless I made a really stupid error otherwise the two versions >> of readdir should have the same semantics. > > Yes, your patch looks sane. I have no idea why it breaks stuff... Are you sure it's patch 6? Patch 17 adds a deadlock in rename path. -- tejun _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers