On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 01:57:07 -0600, ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > > Got it: It's patch 6, the readdir simplification. > > > > (The udev on that guest is ancient (063)...) > > Ok. That is weird. More weirdness. If I activate another dasd from the repair file system, /dev/dasdb is created... Same if I set the card reader online: /dev/vmrdr-0.0.000c is created as expected. > Does it depend on the order in which the dentries are returned from > readdir? I'd think not. > Unless I made a really stupid error otherwise the two versions > of readdir should have the same semantics. Yes, your patch looks sane. I have no idea why it breaks stuff... _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
