Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 13:14 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote: > >> Separate limits for RSS and RSS+pagecache are also a must. > > This I still disagree upon. Page-cache limits are orthogonal to > containers and not a requirement for containers. If you want such a > feature get it in Linux proper and don't sneak it in the backdoor via > containers. > > > Peter, In these patches, we provide memory control that includes mapped pages and unmapped pages (as discussed in the BOF). All memory is treated uniformly. We will not have separate page cache control, what we can have is control for either mapped pages or control for a combination of mapped and unmapped pages together. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
