Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 13:14 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote: > >> Separate limits for RSS and RSS+pagecache are also a must. > > This I still disagree upon. Page-cache limits are orthogonal to > containers and not a requirement for containers. If you want such a > feature get it in Linux proper and don't sneak it in the backdoor via > containers. What I wanted to say is that *iff* we need limit for booth the RSS and the page cache, then we do need a separate limit for the RSS only. I do not vote for the page cache limit either, but I do not vote _against_ it as well, and agree to take part in its development. Thanks, Pavel. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
