Re: New pid namespaces patches testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[ ... ]

>>> I do believe that Suka's hierarchical model is better than mine,
>>> but my point is: let's support the flat model as well.
>>
>> OK. First thing we can do is to find what they have in common and 
>> get that included. Then, after the first round, we might even find 
>> some more to reach the MULTI model :) 
> 
> The [PREP xxx] series of patches does exactly this. It has the proc
> changes, all the necessary things to work with pid numbers, all the
> preparations in kernel/pid.c, signal handling, etc. Do you mind using
> this?

I'll take a look. 

Thanks,

C.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux