New pid namespaces patches testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



OK. We have measured the nptl perf test for init namespace.
Summary - flat model is very light, Suka's patches break the 
kernel performance event when CONFIG_PID_NS is off.

                 |    perf, s   | perf loss  |
-----------------+--------------+------------+
2.6.22-rc4-mm2   | 13.79 ± 0.13 |    ---     |
                 |              |            |
suka  + PID_NS=n | 14.07 ± 0.13 |    2.0%    |
suka  + PID_NS=y | 14.06 ± 0.08 |    2.0%    |
                 |              |            |
pavel + PID_NS=n | 13.80 ± 0.07 |    0.0%    |
pavel + FLAT     | 13.80 ± 0.07 |    0.0%    |
pavel + MULTI    | 14.28 ± 0.08 |    3.5%    |
-----------------+--------------+------------+

I do believe that Suka's hierarchical model is better than mine,
but my point is: let's support the flat model as well.

Thanks,
Pavel.
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux