On 4/5/07, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@xxxxx> wrote: > > That sort of implies that we need to split the container fork > > mechanism up into two parts, one early to add the refcount to the > > parent's container_group, and one late to handle the callbacks if > > desired. But that should be pretty straightforward. > > Splitting sounds good. I'll try to prepare an appropriate patch. I just did this in my tree. It's a pretty simple patch, but it's a bit ugly. > >> 2. early need for rss containers (earlier than initcalls > >> are called) > > > > Couldn't you copy the way cpuset_init_early() works? > > I did this in my previous version of rss container, > but I think it can be generalized. This is initialization > code that must not be nice-looking, but if it can be it > should be. > Agreed, nice looking code is better :-) Did you have any suggestions, other than moving container_init() earlier in the boot process? Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
