On 4/3/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But frankly I don't know where we stand right now wrt the containers > patches. Do most people want to go with Vatsa's latest version moving > containers into nsproxy? Has any other development been going on? > Paul, have you made any updates? I've not made major changes since the last patch post, just some small optimizations and fixes - I've been too tied up with other stuff. Whilst I've got no objection in general to using nsproxy rather than the container_group object that I introduced in my latest patches, I think that Vatsa's approach of losing the general container object is flawed, since it loses any kind of per-group generic state (e.g. "this container is being deleted") and last time I saw it, I think it would tend to lose processes so that they didn't show up in any directory in the container fs. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
