On 4/3/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:10:35AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > > Agreed. So I'm not saying it's fundamentally a bad idea - just that > > merging container_group and nsproxy is a fairly simple space > > optimization that could easily be done later. > > IMHO, if we agree that space optimization is important, then its better > we tackle it right at design phase, rather than ripping it out later .. > "Premature optimization is the root of all evil". I think we're in agreement that there's value in having an aggregator to avoid every task having to have a forest of pointers. But it wouldn't be a major design change to switch that aggregator from being container_group to being nsproxy at some later point. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
