On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 03:25:07PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > doesn't look so good for me, mainly becaus of the > > additional per page data and per page processing > > > > on 4GB memory, with 100 guests, 50% shared for each > > guest, this basically means ~1mio pages, 500k shared > > and 1500k x sizeof(page_container) entries, which > > roughly boils down to ~25MB of wasted memory ... > > > > increase the amount of shared pages and it starts > > getting worse, but maybe I'm missing something here > > > > > We need to decide whether we want to do per-container memory > > > limitation via these data structures, or whether we do it via > > > a physical scan of some software zone, possibly based on Mel's > > > patches. > > > > why not do simple page accounting (as done currently > > in Linux) and use that for the limits, without > > keeping the reference from container to page? > > > > best, > > Herbert > > > > Herbert, > > You lost me in the cc list and I almost missed this part of the > thread. hmm, it is very unlikely that this would happen, for several reasons ... and indeed, checking the thread in my mailbox shows that akpm dropped you ... -------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] RSS controller core From: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@xxxxx> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:55:29 +0300 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] RSS controller core From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@xxxxx> Cc: Kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx>, List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:00:36 -0800 -------------------------------------------------------------------- that's the one I 'group' replied to ... > Could you please not modify the "cc" list. I never modify the cc unless explicitely asked to do so. I wish others would have it that way too :) best, Herbert > Thanks, > Balbir > _______________________________________________ > Containers mailing list > Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers