> doesn't look so good for me, mainly becaus of the > additional per page data and per page processing > > on 4GB memory, with 100 guests, 50% shared for each > guest, this basically means ~1mio pages, 500k shared > and 1500k x sizeof(page_container) entries, which > roughly boils down to ~25MB of wasted memory ... > > increase the amount of shared pages and it starts > getting worse, but maybe I'm missing something here > > > We need to decide whether we want to do per-container memory > > limitation via these data structures, or whether we do it via a > > physical scan of some software zone, possibly based on Mel's patches. > > why not do simple page accounting (as done currently > in Linux) and use that for the limits, without > keeping the reference from container to page? > > best, > Herbert > Herbert, You lost me in the cc list and I almost missed this part of the thread. Could you please not modify the "cc" list. Thanks, Balbir _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
