On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 08:35 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> struct container {
> struct container *parent;
> char *name;
> struct nsproxy *nsproxy;
> struct list_head children;
> };
> struct nsproxy {
> ...
> struct container *container;
> };
Why does a container need a pointer to an nsproxy? I think I missed
that. Is that the "default" set of namespaces for tasks in that
container?
-- Dave
