>> The fact that it is simply dead code for 2.6.20 is probably sufficient >> justification to revert it until we can agree. > > Cedric, do you mind moving these patches to the end of the set, so > that we can continue to develop patches against the -lxc tree without > being depending on these patches? I'd hate to have this become a reason > for people not to develop against -lxc. sure, in next -lxc drop. I've merged the openvz patches in 2.6.19-mm1-lxc1 and will move these id patches down the stack. C.
