Herbert Poetzl <herbert at 13thfloor.at> writes:
> I'd prefer pid_n{s,amespace} too, as it resembles the
> function more closely ...
Yes either pid_ns or pspace.
task_ns is just wrong.
Anyway from what I can tell we are getting a little ahead of ourselves
and not handing the fundamentals. We haven't killed the pid_t's
yet and that is the hard part.
Eric
