On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 12:29:05PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Herbert Poetzl (herbert at 13thfloor.at): > > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:05:30PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > > > BTW... > > > > > > > --- 2.6.18-rc4-mm3.orig/include/linux/sched.h > > > > +++ 2.6.18-rc4-mm3/include/linux/sched.h > > > > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > > > > #define CLONE_STOPPED 0x02000000 /* Start in stopped state */ > > > > #define CLONE_NEWUTS 0x04000000 /* New utsname group? */ > > > > #define CLONE_NEWIPC 0x08000000 /* New ipcs */ > > > > +#define CLONE_NEWUSER 0x10000000 /* New user */ > > > we have place for 3 namespaces more only. > > > Does anyone have a plan what to do then? > > > > what about having a new clone syscall with 32 or > > better 64 bits reserved for namespace stuff, and > > only put basic/generic namespaces or even aggregate > > flags into the existing clone interface? > > > > something like: uts+ipc+user -> CLONE_NEWXYZ > > but CLONE2_NEWUTS, CLONE2_NEWIPC, CLONE2_NEWUSER > > > > best, > > Herbert > > > > PS: what happened to the idea of forwarding > > this whole stuff to _both_ mailing lists? > > as far as I can tell we are adding those lists > > every now and then to the CC, could that be > > addressed soon? > > My understanding is that both openvz and vserver should > be subscribed to the containers list. > > Is that not the case? not that I would know of .. but maybe our list is misconfigured, you'll never know, please double check on your side too TIA, Herbert > -serge