On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 08:05:30PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > BTW... > > > --- 2.6.18-rc4-mm3.orig/include/linux/sched.h > > +++ 2.6.18-rc4-mm3/include/linux/sched.h > > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > > #define CLONE_STOPPED 0x02000000 /* Start in stopped state */ > > #define CLONE_NEWUTS 0x04000000 /* New utsname group? */ > > #define CLONE_NEWIPC 0x08000000 /* New ipcs */ > > +#define CLONE_NEWUSER 0x10000000 /* New user */ > we have place for 3 namespaces more only. > Does anyone have a plan what to do then? what about having a new clone syscall with 32 or better 64 bits reserved for namespace stuff, and only put basic/generic namespaces or even aggregate flags into the existing clone interface? something like: uts+ipc+user -> CLONE_NEWXYZ but CLONE2_NEWUTS, CLONE2_NEWIPC, CLONE2_NEWUSER best, Herbert PS: what happened to the idea of forwarding this whole stuff to _both_ mailing lists? as far as I can tell we are adding those lists every now and then to the CC, could that be addressed soon? > I warned about this at the beginning when we were discussing the > interfaces and this flags soon going to be exhausted, so probably it > is time to do something in advance... > > Thanks, > Kirill > _______________________________________________ > Containers mailing list > Containers at lists.osdl.org > https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/containers