generic/075 and generic/112 regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We are still getting a failure with the netfs/cifs changes in
generic/075 and generic/112

http://smb311-linux-testing.southcentralus.cloudapp.azure.com/#/builders/9/builds/119

That test included these patches from David's netfs branch:

404b22e58fa8 (HEAD -> for-next) netfs, cifs: Improve some debugging bits
e7aef949bd01 cifs: Fix FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE support
ba5ed7cb79de netfs, cifs: Fix handling of short DIO read
499aadc2c674 cifs: Fix lack of credit renegotiation on read retry
f7b3de950e43 netfs: Fix missing iterator reset on retry of short read
011be46dae8c netfs: Fix trimming of streaming-write folios in
netfs_inval_folio()
ea7079dd3372 netfs: Fix netfs_release_folio() to say no if folio dirty
2305510606af mm: Fix missing folio invalidation calls during truncation
11316e31ba23 netfs, ceph: Partially revert "netfs: Replace PG_fscache
by setting folio->private and marking dirty"

In the previous run we had narrowed the regression down to being due
to one of the following two patches:
2e4fe7d5fac8 (HEAD -> netfs-fixes, origin/netfs-fixes) netfs, cifs:
Fix handling of short DIO read
  or
18993747be65 netfs: Fix trimming of streaming-write folios in
netfs_inval_folio()



-- 
Thanks,

Steve




[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux