On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:07 PM Paulo Alcantara <pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Tom Talpey <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On 12/8/2023 12:01 PM, Steve French wrote: > >> Following up on a question about hardlinks and caching data remotely, > >> I tried a simple experiment: > >> > >> 1) ln /mnt/hardlink1 /mnt/hardlink2 > >> then > >> 2) echo "some data" >> /mnt/hardlink1 > >> then > >> 3) echo "more stuff" >> /mnt/hardlink2 > >> > >> I see the second open (ie the one to hardlink2) fail with > >> STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER, presumably due to the lease key being reused > >> for the second open (for hardlink2) came from the first open (of > > > > Ok, so that is a client bug. > > I guess Steve forgot to mention that the above only happens with the > patch applied. This fails for me with mainline (I hadn't tried it with her patches), so yes this appears to be a different client bug -- Thanks, Steve
