Tom Talpey <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 12/8/2023 12:01 PM, Steve French wrote: >> Following up on a question about hardlinks and caching data remotely, >> I tried a simple experiment: >> >> 1) ln /mnt/hardlink1 /mnt/hardlink2 >> then >> 2) echo "some data" >> /mnt/hardlink1 >> then >> 3) echo "more stuff" >> /mnt/hardlink2 >> >> I see the second open (ie the one to hardlink2) fail with >> STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER, presumably due to the lease key being reused >> for the second open (for hardlink2) came from the first open (of > > Ok, so that is a client bug. I guess Steve forgot to mention that the above only happens with the patch applied.
