Re: cifs hardlink misbehaviour in generic/002?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: cifs hardlink misbehaviour in generic/002?
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 09:39:43 +0000
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, Steve French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxx>, ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx, aaptel@xxxxxxxxx, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAKYAXd9ijC1ypq=JUgkmtgaN6KDUxLiUr_RT+Ju7kXNadRwhrw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
References: <CAKYAXd9ijC1ypq=JUgkmtgaN6KDUxLiUr_RT+Ju7kXNadRwhrw@mail.gmail.com> <3755038.1701447306@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We have already sent the fixes on this week, So It has been in the
> latest linus master.
> Could you please check it on the latest master or after applying
> commit 4274a9dc6aeb "ksmbd: separately allocate ci per dentry" ?

Yep.  That fixes it.

David

References:
- Re: cifs hardlink misbehaviour in generic/002?
  - From: Namjae Jeon
- cifs hardlink misbehaviour in generic/002?
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: Name string of SMB2_CREATE_ALLOCATION_SIZE is AlSi or AISi ?
Next by Date: Re: Name string of SMB2_CREATE_ALLOCATION_SIZE is AlSi or AISi ?
Previous by thread: Re: cifs hardlink misbehaviour in generic/002?
Next by thread: generic/304 doesn't seem terminable for cifs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux