* Steve French (smfrench@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 9:40 AM Dr. David Alan Gilbert > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Actually, would you be ok with smb_unicode_common ? The reason is that > > > > you end up with a module named unicode_common that sounds too generic. > > > > > > I'd suggest make it generic and move it to fs/nls/. I'd run it by the nls > > > maintainers, but I don't think there are any. > > > > Steve & Tom - would you be OK with that? > > Yes - absolutely OK. > > (Copying in Gabriel Bertazi, owner of fs/unicode; although this isn't > > utf-8) > > Unicode UCS-2 (I'm going to regret the next question...) So how does this compare to the stuff in include/linux/ucs2_string.h and lib/ucs2_string.c ? Dave > > -- > Thanks, > > Steve -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
