On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 9:40 AM Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Actually, would you be ok with smb_unicode_common ? The reason is that > > > you end up with a module named unicode_common that sounds too generic. > > > > I'd suggest make it generic and move it to fs/nls/. I'd run it by the nls > > maintainers, but I don't think there are any. > > Steve & Tom - would you be OK with that? Yes - absolutely > (Copying in Gabriel Bertazi, owner of fs/unicode; although this isn't > utf-8) Unicode UCS-2 -- Thanks, Steve
