Tom Talpey <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > On 8/26/2022 12:01 PM, Paulo Alcantara wrote: >> Tom Talpey <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Easy enough! How do I know if it "passes" though? My understanding >>> is that a bunch of tests are expected to fail, or at least warn. >>> Do I need to test a clean client, then compare results? Or am I >>> misunderstanding, and FSTYP=cifs is taking care of it? >> >> That's a really good question. We have a pre-defined list of tests that >> get run by a specfic SMB version, server, if multichannel, etc. > > Yeah, there are a few exclusion files on the wiki, but they look > really old. Also, I cannot believe that "vers=3.0" is the proper > default, as linked there!!! Yeah :-( We should definitely update it. >> Steve might send you the list of pre-defined tests that get run on our >> buildbot so you can try it out. He usually keeps those lists >> up-to-date. > > The buildbot doesn't do RDMA, or I'd consider that. But it's a lot > more convenient to have a local harness either way. It currently doesn't, unfortunately. You could at least get the same set of tests that run over 3.1.1 against samba and/or ksmbd and then change mount options to get RDMA enabled. And of course, let us know when you get it working and let's add it to our buildbot as well ;-)
