On 06/09, Tom Talpey wrote:
I tried to stick to the current behaviour, while also fixing the issue
of getting a TTL=0 from key.dns_resolver upcall.
A mount option looks indeed better initially, and that was also my
initial approach to this. But in a, e.g. multi-domain forest, with
multiple DFS targets, the per-mount setting starts to look irrelevant
again as well. So I took the "per-client" approach instead.
Ok, I guess. It seems like kicking the can down the road, a little.
I agree that rearchitecting the DNS cache might be extreme, but many
distros consider procfs to be a user API, and they'll require it to
be supported basically forever. That would be unfortunate...
Thanks, I didn't know that. I'll re-work on the patch and take this in
consideration then.
Cheers,
Enzo
