Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce dns_interval procfs setting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Enzo,

Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@xxxxxxx> writes:

> These 2 patches are a simple way to fix the DNS issue that
> currently exists in cifs, where the upcall to key.dns_resolver will
> always return 0 for the record TTL, hence, making the resolve worker
> always use the default value SMB_DNS_RESOLVE_INTERVAL_DEFAULT
> (currently 600 seconds).
>
> This also makes the new setting `dns_interval' user-configurable via
> procfs (/proc/fs/cifs/dns_interval).

How is the user supposed to know which TTL value will be used?  If the
expire time is set by either key.dns_resolver or any other program used
for dns_resolver key, the above setting would no longer work and users
might get confused.



[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux