does "cifs: we do not need a spinlock around the tree access during umount" need to go to stable as well

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Since "cifs: we do not need a spinlock around the tree access during
umount" fixes "cifs: fix handlecache and multiuser" (commit
47178c7722ac528ea08aa82c3ef9ffa178962d7a) which was marked for stable.
I marked "cifs: we do not need a spinlock around the tree access
during umount" for stable as well.

Let me know if you want me to change that.


-- 
Thanks,

Steve



[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux