Re: setcifsacl: Shouldn't 0x0 be a valid mask?

[Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>]

I changed a file in a place I could mount remotely and getcifsacl is 
showing a permision mask of 0. So it does look like it is possible 
to get them in NTFS.
# getcifsacl test-bruno
# filename: test-bruno
REVISION:0x1
CONTROL:0x8404
OWNER:S-1-5-21-1229272821-630328440-682003330-2408
GROUP:S-1-5-21-1229272821-630328440-682003330-513
DACL:
ACL:S-1-3-4:ALLOWED/0x0/
ACL:S-1-5-18:ALLOWED/I/FULL
ACL:S-1-5-32-544:ALLOWED/I/FULL
No SACL