Re: setcifsacl: Shouldn't 0x0 be a valid mask?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:15:26 -0500,
 Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do you have an example of doing the same thing via

"smbcacls" (from Linux) or "icacls" (or cacls.exe) from Windows?

smbcacls seems to also not allow 0x0 for the permissions part of the ACL. I'll see if I can check on cacls.exe.



[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux