HI, Pavel, yes, thanks for the pointer, will include in the future. Boris. On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 2:05 PM Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Boris, > > Are you talking about this patch "[PATCH] Extend cifs acl utilities to > handle SACLs"? > > Just for the future, I am trying to monitor the samba-dev mailing list > but if you would like to get the fastest response to your patches then > please include me directly or at least the linux-cifs mailing list. > > I stage pending patches in the "next" branch on my github tree, so, > will include the one above. > > https://github.com/piastry/cifs-utils/commits/next > > -- > Best regards, > Pavel Shilovsky > > пн, 7 дек. 2020 г. в 07:28, Boris Protopopov <boris.v.protopopov@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > Hello, Shyam, > > > > sorry for the delayed reply and thanks for looking at this patch. Yes, > > the testing was done using the extended versions of > > getcifsacl/setcifsacl (added setting owner and SACL support), the > > patch for that posted recently via samba-technical (message ID > > <20201120214918.12517-1-pboris@xxxxxxxxxx>). I have tested > > setting/getting the owner, DACL, and SACL, for all the DACL/SACL flags > > (-a, -D, -M, -S), SACL type SYSTEM_AUDIT. This testing was done > > against 5.10.0-rc1 and 4.14.203 (the latter required porting the > > user-space patch). I believe this testing has fully exercised the code > > changes in question. > > > > I will look at contributing to the fsxtesting-cifs code, but I think > > the setcifsacl/getcifsact patch that enables easy access to the > > descriptor components is a pre-requisite for such contributions. > > > > Thanks! > > > >
