Re: Can we have cifsmount.conf?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Some interesting points you make about hypothetical things that could
be included, and I hadn't thought about your point:

> For module arguments, such as disable smb1 completely we already have /etc/modprobe.d

but how would you persist settings for /proc/fs/cifs/*
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:59 PM Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Are we mixing module arguments and mount options in the same mechanism, and should we?
>
>
> Module arguments are global in the sense that we only have a single instance of the module loaded into the kernel
> and its settings apply to all client connections and mounts.
>
> For module arguments, such as disable smb1 completely we already have /etc/modprobe.d and it should be sufficient?
> It is already persistent and it controls the arguments for loading the module.
>
>
>
> I see a hypothetical /etc/cifsmount.conf as orthogonal to this. This should not be about module arguments but rather
> mount options. Either global mount options or mount options that automatically apply (and override the user command line)
> on a per server or mountpoint basis.
>
> It could be used to say things like :
> * only allow SMB2+ mounts... (even if the module itself allows smb1)
> * use smb1 and posix for servers a/b/c...
> ...
>
> and mount.cifs would parse this file and add the arguments that were missing automatically.
>
>
> regards
> ronnie sahlberg
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Kenneth Dsouza" <kdsouza@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "CIFS" <linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, 29 June, 2018 1:46:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Can we have cifsmount.conf?
>
> since there are only about 20 of the 90 cifs mount options that are
> needed for 99% of the cases this tool may not be that bad to create -
> and of course for extra-credit/bonus-points a GUI mount tool which
> exposes the smallest sane subset of mount options might be useful to
> some - and could also be added to cifs-utils
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:44 PM Kenneth Dsouza <kdsouza@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, I will take a look at the pre-existing code for
> > reference(nfs-utils and other).
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > I think this is a reasonable idea - and nfs-utils's parsing for this
> > > config file (in mount.nfs e.g.) may be similar enough to smb3
> > > requirements in some cases - but don't rule out the idea of seeing if
> > > anything is shareable/reuseable with Samba (to allow e.g. smbcacls or
> > > small client utilities to benefit from cifs.ko configuration and vice
> > > versa).   In addition don't rule out the idea of writing small
> > > cifs-utils that allow sane setting of the text configuration file (ala
> > > "net conf <section> <keyword> <value>" or equivalent.  One of the
> > > curses of many text config files is difficulty figuring out
> > > options/syntax etc. and making spelling mistakes so in a perfect world
> > > the user could set the config file values with an easy to use
> > > cifs-util tool (vaguely similar to "net conf ..." perhaps)
> > >
> > > If we allow setting the 5-10 module install parms and then the things
> > > configurable in /proc/fs/cifs/* ... we would need some way to load
> > > them on reboot.
> > >
> > > The nfs example may be useful but it is more focused on mount parms it
> > > seems rather than other config values.
> > >
> > > But if you want to pursue this it seems promising to investigate
> > > nfsmount.conf and whether there is something vaguely similar we could
> > > do for smb3 but ... I would prefer if along with that we had an easy
> > > to use tool to set the values and provide help on the valid options
> > > etc. (there may be a lot we can also learn by the way from other fs
> > > tools as models - e.g. "iostat" and "nfsiostat" if looking at these
> > > tools for other file systems)
> > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 9:35 PM Kenneth Dsouza <kdsouza@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> >
> > I agree we can have a  cifs-conf command for example. This command
> > will help us retrieve mount  settings and make changes directly to the
> > /etc/cifsmount.conf.
> > This will help us to only add valid options and avoid typos.
> >
> > >>
> > >> I was just wondering why we don't have a /etc/cifsmount.conf just like /etc/nfsmount.conf for mount options.  I would like to work on it, if we can add this functionality.
> > >> Using this we can easily disable smb1.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Kenneth D'souza
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Steve
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Thanks,

Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux