On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:11:02PM -0500, Steve French wrote: > Agreed but I do want to follow up with Ronnie on loosely related question of > how cifs and NFS and similar filesystems parse no op mount options like noatime I take this as an ACK then, please let me know if you didn't really mean that :) Thank you both for review! Eryu > > On Mon, May 28, 2018, 22:55 Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Xiaoli, > > I think it is fine to skip the atime tests for CIFS. > > The behaviour of atime/noatime for cifs is basically noatime always. > When we read from the server the server will update the atime independently > of > cisf.ko but then any further reads that we do from cache will never push > any updates > to the server. > > Ronnie > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Xiaoli Feng" <xifeng@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: "Eryu Guan" <guaneryu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Leif Sahlberg" < > lsahlber@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sent: Monday, 28 May, 2018 4:40:56 PM > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] common/rc: skip atime related tests on CIFS > > > > Add Ronnie to to list. > > > > Hello Ronnie, > > what's the expected behavior from CIFS on atime/noatime? We want to > skip > > the > > atime related tests on cifs for xfstests just like nfs. But not sure if > it's > > correct. What do you think about it? > > > > Thanks. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Eryu Guan" <guaneryu@xxxxxxxxx> > > > To: "XiaoLi Feng" <xifeng@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2018 8:50:58 PM > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] common/rc: skip atime related tests on CIFS > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:23:56AM +0800, Xiaoli Feng wrote: > > > > From: xiaoli feng <xifeng@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > The atime related mount options have no effect on cifs mounts > > > > now or in the future. So skip these tests on CIFS. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: xiaoli feng <xifeng@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Looks fine to me. But I really need an ACK from cifs folks. > > > > > > > --- > > > > common/rc | 2 ++ > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc > > > > index ffe5323..d3af55f 100644 > > > > --- a/common/rc > > > > +++ b/common/rc > > > > @@ -3244,6 +3244,8 @@ _require_atime() > > > > _exclude_scratch_mount_option "noatime" > > > > if [ "$FSTYP" == "nfs" ]; then > > > > _notrun "atime related mount options have no effect on NFS" > > > > + elif [ "$FSTYP" == "cifs" ]; then > > > > + _notrun "atime related mount options have no effect on > CIFS" > > > > > > Or just change the check to a case-switch on $FSTYP? > > > > Ok, I will change it on the next commit. > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Eryu > > > > > > > fi > > > > } > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 1.8.3.1 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in > > > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in > > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe fstests" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
