Hadrien Grasland <grasland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Just tried out this patch, and the CIFS module does indeed produce > well-formed GetInfo requests now (according to Wireshark's definition at > least, didn't check myself). > > However, the server will still reject the request with a > STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED error, suggesting that Steve's interpretation was > the right one: this is likely a server-side bug. Yes. As Steve suggested as a workaround, we could try to use a less detailed information level if FullInfo fails. Is it worth doing for a single old NetApp server? As for the offset and extra byte in QUERY_INFO I guess having the length set to 0 makes it ok... I've sent a couple of patches to Wireshark to fix the packet parsing. It now accepts the empty filename in CREATE (no more "[unknown]"), which enables the proper parsing of the unknown field. -- Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
