On 19/10/14 22:48, Jurjen Bokma wrote:
On 10/19/2014 10:42 PM, steve wrote:
On 19/10/14 22:30, Jurjen Bokma wrote:
So I would very much like to use SMB3 to get to the Windows file
servers. Kerberized SMB1 worked like a charm. Speed/bandwidth is not
really the issue here.
Yeah, of course. Never knew there was any security involved. Worrying.
Did you ever have SMB3 working Kerberized? If I know it's supposed to
work, I'll give up less easily.
Hi
We have everything default. We'd no idea that smb3 existed until this
thread. Anyway, it doesn't work here either:
CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -128
I think the Kerberos has worked because that codes means that the ticket
has expired, except it hasn't because removing vers=3.0 mounts fine.
But we don't know if our Samba4 file servers are capable of it anyway. I
think we'd have to change something in smb.conf.
Maybe the devs will look if you bugzilla it?
Good luck,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
