Re: CIFS VFS: Send error in Flush = -9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 18:02:10 -0800 (PST)
Jeff Berman <spamact@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi guys,
> 
> I installed a 3.12.9 kernel, but the "Send error in Flush = -9" errors still appear in quantity.  Any other ideas?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jeff
> 

(cc'ing linux-cifs -- sorry, I don't do private support unless you're
 paying me ;)

What would be best is to reopen the bug and attach a new capture if
you're still seeing the problem. Are there multiple machines involved
that are connecting through any sort of NAT? If so, then they'll all
need the same patch...

> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: Jeff Berman <spamact@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 10:58 AM
> > Subject: Re: CIFS VFS: Send error in Flush = -9
> > 
> > On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:45:16 -0800 (PST)
> > Jeff Berman <spamact@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >>  Hi Jeff,
> >> 
> >>  Thanks for your reply!  What you said makes sense to me.  I'd like to 
> > apply the patch but after researching kernel patches for a couple hours I 
> > realize that I'm in over my head.  I have no problem attempting it, but I 
> > can't figure out how to tell if my current kernel contains it already or how 
> > to install it (and any needed prerequisites).  My Xubuntu installation is at 
> > "Ubuntu 3.11.0-15.25-generic 3.11.10".
> >> 
> >>  You're obviously super busy, but can you suggest a link with relevant 
> > instructions to follow?  There are hundreds of different kernel guides out there 
> > dating back over a decade.
> >> 
> >>  Thanks again!
> >> 
> >>  Jeff
> >> 
> > 
> > I'm pretty sure that patch went into mainline in v3.12, so it's likely
> > your v3.11 kernel doesn't have it. The trivial way to get it would be
> > to just move to a v3.12 kernel.
> > 
> > If that's not possible you'll probably just need to get the sources for
> > your kernel apply the patch to it and build it (I assume it should just
> > apply directly with little or no merge conflicts)...or talk the ubuntu
> > folks into doing it for you.
> > 
> > Good luck!
> > 
> > 
> >> 
> >>  ----- Original Message -----
> >>  > From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>  > To: Jeff Berman <spamact@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>  > Cc: linux-cifs <linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Shirish Pargaonkar 
> > <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>  > Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2014 3:00 AM
> >>  > Subject: Re: CIFS VFS: Send error in Flush = -9
> >>  > 
> >>  > On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 01:21:45 -0800 (PST)
> >>  > 
> >>  > Jeff Berman <spamact@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>  > 
> >>  >>  > From: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>  >> 
> >>  >>  > To: Jeff Berman <spamact@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>  >>  > Cc: linux-cifs <linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>  >>  > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:07 PM
> >>  >>  > Subject: Re: CIFS VFS: Send error in Flush = -9
> >>  >>  > 
> >>  >>  > -9 is EBADF.
> >>  >>  > 
> >>  >>  > If you can send a wireshark trace of traffic between client 
> > and server
> >>  >>  > that would be helpful.
> >>  >>  > 
> >>  >>  > 
> >>  >>  > 
> >>  >>  > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Jeff Berman 
> > <spamact@xxxxxxxxx> 
> >>  > wrote:
> >>  >>  >>  Hi there,
> >>  >>  >> 
> >>  >>  >>  I'm getting lots of CIFS errors in my system log:
> >>  >>  >> 
> >>  >>  >>  Jan 30 08:46:05 Server1 kernel: [747319.264235] CIFS 
> > VFS: Send 
> >>  > error
> >>  >>  >>   in Flush = -9
> >>  >>  >>  Jan 30 08:46:05 Server1 kernel: [747319.264235] CIFS 
> > VFS: Send 
> >>  > error
> >>  >>  >>   in Flush = -9
> >>  >>  >>  Jan 30 08:46:05 Server1 kernel: [747319.264235] CIFS 
> > VFS: Send 
> >>  > error
> >>  >>  >>   in Flush = -9
> >>  >> 
> >>  >> 
> >>  >>  Ok, I think I did the wireshark trace correctly.  It's 
> > attached to bug 
> >>  > 10417 (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10417).
> >>  >> 
> >>  >>  Thank you!
> >>  > 
> >>  > Ok, I took a look and I'm pretty sure the problem is the 
> > long-standing
> >>  > bug in how the client tried to use virtual circuits. Applying this
> >>  > patch from mainline kernels should help things:
> >>  > 
> >>  > commit 9ae6cf606a33b0a762798df0fb742848bcc685b5
> >>  > Author: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>  > Date:   Mon Sep 16 11:23:45 2013 -0400
> >>  > 
> >>  >     cifs: stop trying to use virtual circuits
> >>  > 
> >>  > Please let us know if it doesn't.
> > 
> >>  > 
> >>  > -- 
> >>  > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>  >> 
> >>  > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 


-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux