On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 01:21:45 -0800 (PST) Jeff Berman <spamact@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Shirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > To: Jeff Berman <spamact@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-cifs <linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:07 PM > > Subject: Re: CIFS VFS: Send error in Flush = -9 > > > > -9 is EBADF. > > > > If you can send a wireshark trace of traffic between client and server > > that would be helpful. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Jeff Berman <spamact@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi there, > >> > >> I'm getting lots of CIFS errors in my system log: > >> > >> Jan 30 08:46:05 Server1 kernel: [747319.264235] CIFS VFS: Send error > >> in Flush = -9 > >> Jan 30 08:46:05 Server1 kernel: [747319.264235] CIFS VFS: Send error > >> in Flush = -9 > >> Jan 30 08:46:05 Server1 kernel: [747319.264235] CIFS VFS: Send error > >> in Flush = -9 > > > Ok, I think I did the wireshark trace correctly. It's attached to bug 10417 (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10417). > > Thank you! Ok, I took a look and I'm pretty sure the problem is the long-standing bug in how the client tried to use virtual circuits. Applying this patch from mainline kernels should help things: commit 9ae6cf606a33b0a762798df0fb742848bcc685b5 Author: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon Sep 16 11:23:45 2013 -0400 cifs: stop trying to use virtual circuits Please let us know if it doesn't. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
