On 07/20/2013 11:24 PM, Scott Lovenberg wrote: > > > Sent from my iPod > > On Jul 20, 2013, at 6:43, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 22:44:22 -0400 >> Scott Lovenberg <scott.lovenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On Jul 19, 2013, at 22:34, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Leaving Max share length at 256 is fine with me >>> Works for me. Should this be fixed kernel side? >> >> Yes, I think that would make sense. Scott, I assume you'll send a v2 of >> this patch that preserves the share length at 256? >> >> Once that's done, the ideal thing here would be to move these >> definitions in the kernel to a separate header file that lives under >> include/linux. Then we could have autoconf in cifs-utils look for that >> header and use the #defines from that instead if it's present. >> >> That way we won't be so reliant on keeping the kernel and cifs-utils in >> sync... > > Yeah. I'll respin and send tomorrow. I have a wedding to attend this afternoon. Using autoconf would be terrific and I'm completely on board with that idea. > Is it better to let the new header file in "include/uapi/linux" ? It belongs to the interface between user mode and kernel mode. >> -- >> Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks. -- Chen Gang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
