Sent from my iPod On Jul 20, 2013, at 6:43, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 22:44:22 -0400 > Scott Lovenberg <scott.lovenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Jul 19, 2013, at 22:34, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Leaving Max share length at 256 is fine with me >> Works for me. Should this be fixed kernel side? > > Yes, I think that would make sense. Scott, I assume you'll send a v2 of > this patch that preserves the share length at 256? > > Once that's done, the ideal thing here would be to move these > definitions in the kernel to a separate header file that lives under > include/linux. Then we could have autoconf in cifs-utils look for that > header and use the #defines from that instead if it's present. > > That way we won't be so reliant on keeping the kernel and cifs-utils in > sync... Yeah. I'll respin and send tomorrow. I have a wedding to attend this afternoon. Using autoconf would be terrific and I'm completely on board with that idea. > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
