On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2013 13:21:06 -0500
> Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I sent a merge request for the setops fix, the other five in your
>> for-3.10 are queued in the for-3.10 branch (and for-3.11 branch there
>> are five more in for-3.11 from your longer series that I have already
>> reviewed and put in - note that this for-3.11 branch is soon to be
>> called "for-next" so linux-next will be building it)
>>
>> In the series of patches for-3.10 I did fix up two formatting errors
>> that checkpatch noticed:
>>
>
> Thanks for fixing those.
>
>> I have reviewed 3 of the 5 of your most recent patches in for-3.10,
>> but would appreciate more review especially on the two larger ones
>> ("fix error handling ..." and "fix composing ...") in that series.
>>
>
> Ok...
cifs-2.6.git for-next is fixed up to look like a "for-3.11" branch.
There also is still a for-3.10 with the five patches I know about
for-3.10 still - if you know of any others that should go in for-3.10
let me know. Perhaps the removexattr patch might be one for example.
--
Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
