Re: queued patches for 3.10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 24 May 2013 13:21:06 -0500
Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I sent a merge request for the setops fix, the other five in your
> for-3.10 are queued in the for-3.10 branch (and for-3.11 branch there
> are five more in for-3.11 from your longer series that I have already
> reviewed and put in - note that this for-3.11 branch is soon to be
> called "for-next" so linux-next will be building it)
> 
> In the series of patches for-3.10 I did fix up two formatting errors
> that checkpatch noticed:
> 

Thanks for fixing those.

> I have reviewed 3 of the 5 of your most recent patches in for-3.10,
> but would appreciate more review especially on the two larger ones
> ("fix error handling ..."  and "fix composing ...") in that series.
> 

Ok...

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux