Issue with upgrade to kernel 3.4.10 -> invalid argument error

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greetings,


I am having an issue mounting CIFS shares since we upgraded our Linux kernel from 2.6.27 to 3.4.10. Each time I try to mount a share drive I get an "Invalid argument" error message even though I am using the same command line that had previously worked, e.g.:

mount -t cifs //172.16.1.10/allusers /mnt/TEST -o 'ro,user=cifs,password=secret

I went ahead and checked the source code, and found out that the following condition did not evaluate to true:

fs/cifs/connect.c:2130
	if (volume_info->UNCip && volume_info->UNC)
	{
        	rc = cifs_fill_sockaddr((struct sockaddr *)&addr,
                	    volume_info->UNCip,
	                    strlen(volume_info->UNCip),
        	            volume_info->port);

Thus I obtained a kernel message "Connecting to DFS root not implemented yet." So I am now explicitly specifying the UNC as an option, as well as the device name:

mount -t cifs //172.16.1.10/allusers /mnt/TEST -o 'ro,user=cifs,password=secret,unc=\\172.16.1.10\allusers'

Question #1: Why do I have to explicitly provide the UNC now?

It almost seem like a bug to me, given that the devname parameter to the cifs_parse_mount_options function already contains this information. The newest sources for the 3.7-rc1 kernel seem to have no changes in this regard (even though I just took a *quick* look at those sources.)

If this is a bug I would be glad to provide a patch to fix it.

The second observation that I made concerned specifying the UNC as an option and passing in slashes as separators instead of backslashes:

mount -t cifs //172.16.1.10/allusers /mnt/TEST -o 'ro,user=cifs,password=secret,unc=//172.16.1.10/allusers'

This also results in an invalid argument error, as the parser does not convert all slashes into backslashes (for the unc option, as the devname parameter is already converted!), and thus extract_hostname is not able to function properly.

Question #2: Should this be considered a bug?

If that is the case, I would like to suggest the attached bugfix.

Please let me know what you think and thank you in advance for your kind support!


Best regards,


--
Federico Sauter / Senior firmware programmer
Innominate Security Technologies AG / protecting industrial networks
tel: +49.30.921028-210 / fax: +49.30.921028-020
Rudower Chaussee 13 / D-12489 Berlin / http://www.innominate.com/

Register Court: AG Charlottenburg, HR B 81603
Management Board: Dirk Seewald
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Christoph Leifer
--- fs/cifs/connect.c.stable	2012-10-16 16:44:50.000000000 +0200
+++ fs/cifs/connect.c.fixed	2012-10-16 18:56:37.000000000 +0200
@@ -1204,6 +1204,7 @@
 	char *string = NULL;
 	char *tmp_end, *value;
 	char delim;
+	char *p, *q;
 
 	separator[0] = ',';
 	separator[1] = 0;
@@ -1662,12 +1663,12 @@
 				printk(KERN_WARNING "CIFS: no memory for UNC\n");
 				goto cifs_parse_mount_err;
 			}
-			strcpy(vol->UNC, string);
 
-			if (strncmp(string, "//", 2) == 0) {
-				vol->UNC[0] = '\\';
-				vol->UNC[1] = '\\';
-			} else if (strncmp(string, "\\\\", 2) != 0) {
+			for (p = string, q = vol->UNC; *p; ++p, ++q) {
+				*q = *p == '/'? '\\' : *p;
+			}
+			*q = '\0';
+			if (strncmp(vol->UNC, "\\\\", 2) != 0) {
 				printk(KERN_WARNING "CIFS: UNC Path does not "
 						    "begin with // or \\\\\n");
 				goto cifs_parse_mount_err;

[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux