On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:28:09 +0530 Ankit Jain <jankit@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > On 06/26/2012 04:58 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > [snip] > > It does, but we do have to concern ourselves with older versions of > > systemd that might not, and with distros that might use systemd but not > > add the tool (consider embedded distros). I think we'll need a > > mechanism to fall back to the legacy password mechanism. > > I'm guessing that by "legacy" you mean get_pass(..)? But on a regular > systemd install, it takes over stdin/stdout, and the prompt won't come > up on a terminal. But I don't know how it is set up on the other > scenarios you mentioned. So, I'll do that but you will have to test it > ;) I tried using /dev/tty, but in/out are redirected AFAIU, so, this > didn't help. > > > Also, a way to disable this at compile-time would nice. Maybe a > > --enable-systemd autoconf option would be good that defaults to "on" > > with a simple test to see if the build machine is running systemd? > > Sure, autoconf option sounds good. But do we want to check for systemd > running on the *build* machine (and choose default value for > --enable-systemd accordingly)? Systemd running or not sounds like a > runtime behavior, and we fall back to getpass anyway. I haven't added > this in the attached patch, but if you feel that this makes sense, then > I can add it. > > Regards, Merged... -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
