On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Konstantinos Skarlatos <k.skarlatos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 30/12/2011 11:46 μμ, Konstantinos Skarlatos wrote: >> >> On 30/12/2011 8:00 μμ, Konstantinos Skarlatos wrote: >>> >>> On 30/12/2011 3:11 μμ, Jeff Layton wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 11:04:59 +0200 >>>> Konstantinos Skarlatos<k.skarlatos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 29/12/2011 3:54 μμ, Konstantinos Skarlatos wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Πέμπτη, 29 Δεκέμβριος 2011 3:39:30 μμ, Jeff Layton wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 12:30:18 +0200 >>>>>>> Konstantinos Skarlatos<k.skarlatos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 29/12/2011 4:04 πμ, Jeff Layton wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:08:57 +0200 >>>>>>>>> Konstantinos Skarlatos<k.skarlatos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I mount via cifs a windows XP share, df gives me correct sizes, >>>>>>>>>> but when >>>>>>>>>> I ls the mount point i get input/output error. >>>>>>>>>> strace: http://pastebin.com/WXf8M1nu >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> mount --verbose -t cifs -o >>>>>>>>>> username=administrator,password=blahblah >>>>>>>>>> //192.168.0.11/jobs /mnt/backups/montaz/jobs >>>>>>>>>> mount.cifs kernel mount options: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ip=192.168.0.11,unc=\\192.168.0.11\jobs,,ver=1,user=administrator,pass=******** >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> df >>>>>>>>>> //192.168.0.11/jobs 114464 >>>>>>>>>> 105196 9268 92% /mnt/backups/montaz/jobs >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ls /mnt/backups/montaz/jobs/ >>>>>>>>>> ls: reading directory /mnt/backups/montaz/jobs/: Input/output >>>>>>>>>> error >>>>>>>>>> total 0 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the fun thing is that i can cd to a lower level directory, and ls >>>>>>>>>> works >>>>>>>>>> fine there! only the mount point has the problem >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ls /mnt/backups/montaz/jobs/test >>>>>>>>>> total 44K >>>>>>>>>> drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Apr 30 2010 blah blah/ >>>>>>>>>> ...... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> kernel version 3.2rc7 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> this seems to be related to : >>>>>>>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/1/427 >>>>>>>>>> Re: [3.0.0+][Regression][Bisected] CIFS: getdents() broken for >>>>>>>>>> large dirs >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hmmm, maybe. What makes you think that it's related? What sort of >>>>>>>>> server are you seeing this against? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Windows XP service pack 2 (greek) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How many files are in the directory? >>>>>>> >>>>>> 140 folders and 20 files >>>>>> >>>>> Attached is a tcp dump of my session. >>>> >>>> I tried reproducing this here, but wasn't able to. Testing against my >>>> xp box worked fine. >>>> >>>> Most likely, the FIND_FILE responses are falling afoul of the code in >>>> coalesce_t2 or check2ndT2. Unfortunately that code is pretty >>>> complicated and I'm not certain what the problem actually is... >>>> >>>> One thing that's interesting is that the total data being sent in the >>>> request is rather large (16336 bytes). I think that's legit, but maybe >>>> it's exceeding the end of the buffer once we try to coalesce it. >>>> >>>> Would it be possible to get the cFYI output from this test? >>> >>> I did not get a cFYI output from that test, but i redid a >>> mount-ls-umount and am attaching the tcpdump >>> Also here http://pastebin.com/J20uC6kU you can find the cifsFYI and >>> the contents of /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData form the same test >>>> >>>> >>>> Is this a regression? Did it work with earlier kernels and only >>>> recently start failing? >>>> >>> I do not know, and i am a bit afraid to downgrade this machine below >>> 3.0 due to some changes arch linux has introduced recently. I can >>> always set up a few virtual machines though, and i can even request >>> permission from my company to give you shell access if you like. Which >>> kernel versions would you like me to test? >> >> I just tested 3.1.5-1-ARCH on a virtual machine and it works, so it is >> probably a regression... On the same virtual machine 3.2-rc7 produces >> input/output error. The virtual machine is a fresh install of arch linux. >> here is the relevant pastebin http://pastebin.com/BwX2DqJC >> and attached is the tcpdump >> As a am a noob to all this, what should I do next in order to help you? >> maybe compile a 3.1 kernel from official sources to make sure no patches >> from arch linux interfere? >> > After some testing, vanilla 3.1.6 does not have this bug and 3.2.0-rc1 has > it. I suspect 3.2.0-rc1 cifs will work correctly against a Windows 2003 or Windows 7 or Window 2008 server. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html