On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:31:15 -0500 > Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> With the proposed cifs.ko fix to honor maxmpx, cifs_max_pending >> because a limit when the server (as Windows often is) has more than 50 >> maxmpxct in its registry. Does anyone mind if I update the maximum >> to one or two hundred? (after the mpx fix is in)? >> > > Ummm...what proposed fix? I've not seen that patch cross the list. Did > I miss it? well ... you asked me to rename one of the flags so I am pretty sure you saw it. I plan to repost it - although it is a little less important now that we realize that the Windows problem can occur even when mpx is 50 (still it is good to honor the server limit). -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
