On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Shane McColman <smccolman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Adding wsize to fstab did not work. I restarted things at 4:15 yesterday > and in less than hour I was back to the same place. > > > Jun 22 16:15:14 fujimoto kernel: [629641.354375] CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup > error -112 > Jun 22 16:15:14 fujimoto kernel: [629641.354383] CIFS VFS: Unexpected lookup > error -112 > Jun 22 17:08:42 fujimoto kernel: [632843.214260] CIFS VFS: Autodisabling the > use of server inode numbers on \\d7gsjxb1\AOI_1 (F). This server doesn't > seem to support them properly. Hardlinks will not be recognized on this > mount. Consider mounting with the "noserverino" option to silence this > message. > Jun 22 17:18:11 fujimoto kernel: [633411.476667] CIFS VFS: Send error in > read = -11 > Jun 22 17:21:11 fujimoto kernel: [633590.919038] CIFS VFS: Send error in > read = -11 > Jun 22 17:23:11 fujimoto kernel: [633710.706852] CIFS VFS: Send error in > read = -11 > Jun 22 17:25:11 fujimoto kernel: [633830.436301] CIFS VFS: Send error in > read = -11 > Jun 22 17:27:41 fujimoto kernel: [633980.129508] CIFS VFS: Send error in > read = -11 > Jun 22 17:28:11 fujimoto kernel: [634010.077463] CIFS VFS: Send error in > read = -11 > Jun 22 17:30:11 fujimoto kernel: [634129.838218] CIFS VFS: Send error in > read = -11 > Jun 22 17:41:10 fujimoto kernel: [634787.992075] CIFS VFS: Send error in > read = -11 > > When I came in this morning I did an ls on the directory to check it and it > has been 15 minutes and I'm still waiting. > > > Shane McColman PEng. > Quality Assurance Engineer > Dynamic Source Manufacturing Inc. > Calgary AB, Canada > > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-cifs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-cifs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shane McColman > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 4:40 PM > To: 'Jeff Layton' > Cc: linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: CIFS VFS errors > > I've restarted things and remounted the drive adding wsize to fstab > > //d7gsjxb1/AOI_1\040(F)/AOI\040Data /mnt/AOIData cifs > rw,_netdev,guest,uid=1000,gid=100,wsize=16384 0 0 > > Should have some answers by Monday if not sooner. > > Shane McColman PEng. > Quality Assurance Engineer > Dynamic Source Manufacturing Inc. > Calgary AB, Canada > > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-cifs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-cifs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Layton > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:33 PM > To: Shane McColman > Cc: linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: CIFS VFS errors > > On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:12:23 -0600 > "Shane McColman" <smccolman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Over the past two days the number of error messages stayed the same but > now >> I'm getting the same problems as reported in >> >> Bug 36952 - [2.6.39] CIFS write failures where 2.6.38 works >> >> I had to restart my software this morning, but I'm pretty sure I should be >> back to the same spot by Monday (if not sooner). I can turn on debug >> logging (as suggested by Jeff in reply to Helge's email) if somebody is >> interested. Just let me know. I really need to get this fixed, so just > let >> me know what I can do to help. >> > > I suspect that the issue is with signed connections. Are you using > signed authentication? The patch that I posted earlier today should fix > this in mainline if so. > > We'll need to do something different for 2.6.39 though. A possible > workaround in the meantime is to set the wsize to something smaller, eg > wsize=16384. Could you try that and let me know if it makes the problem > go away? > > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > what does command modinfo cifs return version of cifs as? I think Jeff's patches are in 1.69 onwards versions of cifs. Looks like the requests are timing out which should not be the case. Do you see reconnects in /proc/fs/cifs/Stats? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html