Would the plan be for Al to merge these out of his tree? On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:54:48 +0400 > Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> 2011/6/17 Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:54:21AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: >> > >> >> See #untested in vfs-2.6.git; I *hope* I've got all the leaks in current >> >> mainline plugged and all sget() races ought to be taken care of. And >> >> yes, the branch name matches the reality - this sucker is completely >> >> untested. Have fun... Commit message is atrocious, of course - I'm too >> >> tired to even try writing a coherent patch description at the moment and >> >> I'll probably need to split it into several patches anyway. Tomorrow... >> > >> > Updated, split up, pushed into #untested. Enjoy... >> > >> >> Today I tried this branch and it was ok. >> >> Steve, Jeff, what do you think? >> > > I did some light testing on it over the weekend and it looks good to me > as well. Nice cleanup, Al. > > -- > Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
