On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:54:48 +0400 Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2011/6/17 Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 04:54:21AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > > >> See #untested in vfs-2.6.git; I *hope* I've got all the leaks in current > >> mainline plugged and all sget() races ought to be taken care of. And > >> yes, the branch name matches the reality - this sucker is completely > >> untested. Have fun... Commit message is atrocious, of course - I'm too > >> tired to even try writing a coherent patch description at the moment and > >> I'll probably need to split it into several patches anyway. Tomorrow... > > > > Updated, split up, pushed into #untested. Enjoy... > > > > Today I tried this branch and it was ok. > > Steve, Jeff, what do you think? > I did some light testing on it over the weekend and it looks good to me as well. Nice cleanup, Al. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
