On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:22:27 +0100 > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> There's no point in supporting NFS export of filesystems if we don't have >> nfsd in the first place. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/cifs/Kconfig | 2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/cifs/Kconfig b/fs/cifs/Kconfig >> index 75c47cd..61e5f95 100644 >> --- a/fs/cifs/Kconfig >> +++ b/fs/cifs/Kconfig >> @@ -175,6 +175,6 @@ config CIFS_SMB2 >> >> config CIFS_NFSD_EXPORT >> bool "Allow nfsd to export CIFS file system (EXPERIMENTAL)" >> - depends on CIFS && EXPERIMENTAL >> + depends on CIFS && NFSD && EXPERIMENTAL >> help >> Allows NFS server to export a CIFS mounted share (nfsd over cifs) > > This looks ok, though I'd still prefer to see all of the nfs exporting > code removed. The cifs protocol has no consistent way to look up inodes > by filehandle and so it simply can never work. > > Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> Patch seems reasonable -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
