Re: mids and cifs sendrcv2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2011/4/15 Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>:
> I think nested mid structures (around a base of common mid fields)
> like the above is going to be the easiest way to handle the differences.
>
> I don't understand your PROTOCOL_ID #define though - we
> identify smb2 vs. cifs via a bool in the tcp server info struct,
> and presumably if we don't have access to the tcp server
> info struct we would have to add a field in the base mid
> (struct mid_q_entry) that indicates smb2 vs. cifs..
>
>
Good variant too. I don't it really matters how to get protocol
version - I just propose an idea how to organize structures.


-- 
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux