On 12/17/2010 08:38 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > It's an atomic_t and the code accesses the "counter" field in it directly > instead of using atomic_read(). It also is sometimes accessed under a > spinlock and sometimes not. Move it out of the spinlock since we don't need > belt-and-suspenders for something that's just informational. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/cifs/cifs_debug.c | 2 +- > fs/cifs/connect.c | 2 +- > fs/cifs/transport.c | 6 +++--- > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@xxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
